2 Separating Hyperplanes 3 Banach–mazur Distance
نویسنده
چکیده
We’ll use the above result to show why the polar of the polar of a convex body is the body itself. Recall that for a convex body K, we had defined its polar K∗ to be {p|k · p ≤ 1∀k ∈ K}. Theorem 2 Let K be a convex body. Then K∗∗ = K. Proof We know that K∗ = {p|k · p ≤ 1∀k ∈ K}. Similarly K∗∗ = {y|p · y ≤ 1∀p ∈ k∗}. Let y be any point in K. Then, by the definition of the polar, for all p ∈ K∗ we have that p · y ≤ 1. The definition of the polar of K∗ implies that y ∈ K∗∗ . Since this is true for every y ∈ K, we conclude that K ⊆ K∗∗ . The other direction of the proof is the nontrivial one and we’ll have to use the convexity of the body and the separating hyperplane theorem. Suppose that we can find a y ∈ K∗∗ such that y / ∈ K. Since y ∈ K∗∗ , we have that p · y ≤ 1 for all p ∈ K∗ . Since y ∈ K, there exists a strongly separating hyperplane for y and K. Let it be H = {x|v · x = 1}. By the definition of separating hyperplane, we have v · k ≤ 1 for all k ∈ K. Hence, v ∈ K∗ . Also, v · y > 1 (since H is a separating hyperplane), and we just showed that v ∈ K∗ . This contradicts our assumption that y ∈ K∗∗ . Hence K∗∗ ⊆ K.
منابع مشابه
On the Banach-mazur Distance between the Cube and the Crosspolytope
In this note we study the Banach-Mazur distance between the n-dimensional cube and the crosspolytope. Previous work shows that the distance has order √ n, and here we will prove some explicit bounds improving on former results. Even in dimension 3 the exact distance is not known, and based on computational results it is conjectured to be 9 5 . Here we will also present computerbased potential o...
متن کاملIntersections of Closed Balls and Geometry of Banach Spaces
In section 1 we present definitions and basic results concerning the Mazur intersection property (MIP) and some of its related properties as the MIP* . Section 2 is devoted to renorming Banach spaces with MIP and MIP*. Section 3 deals with the connections between MIP, MIP* and differentiability of convex functions. In particular, we will focuss on Asplund and almost Asplund spaces. In Section 4...
متن کاملBanach-Mazur Distance of Central Sections of a Centrally Symmetric Convex Body
We prove that the Banach-Mazur distance between arbitrary two central sections of co-dimension c of any centrally symmetric convex body in E is at most (2c+ 1). MSC 2000: 52A21, 46B20
متن کاملEfficiency Analysis Based on Separating Hyperplanes for Improving Discrimination among DMUs
Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a non-parametric method for evaluating the relative technical efficiency for each member of a set of peer decision making units (DMUs) with multiple inputs and multiple outputs. The original DEA models use positive input and output variables that are measured on a ratio scale, but these models do not apply to the variables in which interval scale data can appe...
متن کاملTHE BANACH - MAZUR DISTANCE BETWEEN THE TRACE CLASSES c /
The Banach-Mazur distance between l2 ® l2 and l2 ® l2 is shown to be of the order Vmin(«,m) . Our proof yields that the distance between the trace classes c¡¡ and c¡¡ is of the same order as d(l£, l£). In this note we determine the distances between some tensor products of Euclidean spaces l2, k = 1, 2 ... . Let E, F be finite dimensional Banach spaces over the real field. The Banach-Mazur dist...
متن کامل